Frank, Courageous decision!
But I got confused by that sentence: "In GDAL 1.7 and 1.6 branch the same changes will be applied, except the GTIFF_POINT_GEO_IGNORE configuration option will default to FALSE." Did you mean to say TRUE? Regards, Ivan > -------Original Message------- > From: Frank Warmerdam <warmer...@pobox.com> > To: gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> > Subject: [gdal-dev] Frank Eats Crow - or Fixing PixelIsPoint Interpretation > Sent: Nov 15 '10 20:40 > > Folks, > > After 15 years of denial, and bullheadedness it is now time for me to > admit my interpretation of PixelIsPoint in GeoTIFF files is wrong. To that > end I have prepared a brief RFC discussing how I intend to fix it. I'd > appreciate comment before calling for a vote. > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc33_gtiff_pixelispoint > > Mmmm, crow - it tastes just like chicken! > > Best regards, > -- > > ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam > and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
