Hi,
The code for the LAN/GIS driver uses GDT_Int16 for Pixel type 2, rather
than GDT_UInt16. Is this justified? A user of rgdal has a case of unsigned
16-bit data stored by "a forest landscape model", being treated by the
driver as signed. The header does not seem to have a signed/unsigned flag.
Is this a problem of ambiguity in use of a (closed?) specification, or
should the driver be using GDT_UInt16?
I'm asking on the list first, because this may be ambiguity, not a bug.
Best wishes,
Roger
--
Roger Bivand
Economic Geography Section, Department of Economics, Norwegian School of
Economics and Business Administration, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen,
Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; fax +47 55 95 95 43
e-mail: roger.biv...@nhh.no
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
