Hi list, I'm trying to convert the attached virtual file into a regular geo-tiff.
Note that the dataset defines both a geo-transform and GCPs but
they have different projections.
After conversion if I call gdalinfo on the result file I get
$ gdalinfo out.tif
Driver: GTiff/GeoTIFF
Files:out.tif
Size is 22000, 21890 Coordinate System is:
GEOGCS["WGS 84",
DATUM["WGS_1984",
SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.2572235630016,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],
UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]]
Origin = (359183.000000000000000,4696272.000000000000000)
Pixel Size = (0.500000000000000,-0.500000000000000)
Metadata:
AREA_OR_POINT=Area
Image Structure Metadata:
INTERLEAVE=BAND
Corner Coordinates:
Upper Left ( 359183.000, 4696272.000) (359183d 0'0.00"E,4696272d
0'17179869184.00"N) Lower Left ( 359183.000, 4685327.000) (359183d
0'0.00"E,4685327d 0'17179869184.00"N) Upper Right ( 370183.000,
4696272.000) (370183d 0'0.00"E,4696272d 0'17179869184.00"N) Lower Right
( 370183.000, 4685327.000) (370183d 0'0.00"E,4685327d
0'17179869184.00"N) Center ( 364683.000, 4690799.500) (364683d
0'0.00"E,4690799d30'17179869184.00"N) Band 1 Block=22000x1 Type=UInt16,
ColorInterp=Gray NoData Value=0
The generated geo-tiff has wrong projection info.
Is this a but?
Is there some rule to determine which geographic information is
authoritative?
Best regards
--
Antonio Valentino
CSKS1_GEC_B_S2_33_HH_RA_SF_20090507052430_20090507052438_S01_SBI_geo.vrt
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
