excellent Even thank you, i thought it was something else i had missed.
Even Rouault wrote: > > yes, it is known that gdalwarp -co COMPRESS=LZW will yield to a larger > file > than the one that you can obtain with gdal_translate. This is due to the > how > gdalwarp works internally and there's no obvious way of fixing. > > See http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/UserDocs/GdalWarp#a-coCOMPRESSisbroken > and > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/1688 > > Le Thursday 23 April 2009 22:35:45 TJMartin, vous avez écrit : >> Simone - i posted here rather than over at Geoserver because it was the >> gdal that i couldnt seem to get working rather than the method of loading >> to geoserver. > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/gtiff-file-size-compared-to-original-tiff-%2Bwrld-file-tp2672921p2686357.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
