Thanks so much!  I'll check it in!

Take care,

Jerry James <[email protected]> writes:

> We're building packages for the upcoming Fedora 24 with what will soon
> be released as gcc 6.0, and also with a bleeding edge glibc.  One of
> the two of those, or perhaps both in conjunction, figured out that if
> both pointer arguments to sincos() are not used, then the result is
> equivalent to either sin() or cos().  As a result, the trick in
> o/sfasli.c compiles down to a call to cos() rather than sincos().
> This broke the maxima build.
>
> I have applied the attached patch to the Fedora build to fix the issue.
>
> Regards,

-- 
Camm Maguire                                        [email protected]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah

_______________________________________________
Gcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel

Reply via email to