I think that if there's to be more than one source file extension / type that's checked, there should be a list of them that the user can specify somehow. I have used ".cl" more than ".lisp". But if the algorithm is going to get that complicated, should it really be part of LOAD? I think that LOAD should perhaps do something quite simple, and that if people want something more complicated, they can write it or use of of the DEFSYSTEMs.
-- J. On 12 November 2015 at 16:21, Camm Maguire <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings! > > Blake McBride <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Blake McBride <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Secondly, I think GCL should also auto-check the file extension .lisp >> (not just .lsp) >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Raymond Toy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> .... >> It would be nice if gcl would look for foo.lsp and foo.lisp. It seems >> nowadays most people use "lisp" as the extension, and also some other >> lisps will look for foo.lsp and foo.lisp, it would be nice if gcl >> could do the same. >> >> Yes. Not sure Camm saw this. >> > > Yes I did and I think its a good idea. Will try to get this in soon. > > Take care, > > >> Blake >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gcl-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > -- > Camm Maguire [email protected] > ========================================================================== > "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah > > _______________________________________________ > Gcl-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
