Greetings!
Raymond Toy <[email protected]> writes:
> On 9/7/12 11:45 AM, Camm Maguire wrote:
>> Greetings!
>
> Sorry for the delay! I missed the message earlier.
>>
>> You mention that some implementations disassemble the faulting
>> instruction to get at the operands. I'm wondering if I could do this
>> with Linux's ucontext_t structure, containing fpregs and __fpregs_mem.
> Yes, this is what cmucl does, more or less. You could look there for an
> idea of how to do this. Look at src/code/x86-vm.lisp
One other question, in the local fun
(fop (x)
;; Look at the byte and see what kind of operation is
;; encoded.
(cdr (assoc x '((#x58 . +) (#x59 . *) (#x5c . -) (#x5e . /)))))
you associate #x5e with /, but I get
0x08806681: dc 75 e8 fdivl -0x18(%ebp)
=> 0x08806684: dd 1c 24 fstpl (%esp)
which shows as #475 in the $fop register. This value appeared to make
sense from the intel docs last I looked.
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire [email protected]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
_______________________________________________
Gcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel