Hi,

As some of you know, I am a sociologist who also has a practical interest in
GCL.  I am nominally the maintainer of the Win32 build of GCL, though I'm
also moving a lot of my day to day work to an Ubuntu system (on which I will
eventually run Win32 under Sun's VirtualBox -- I can't seem to get rid of
some of my Win32 software).

I have an interest in studying `FLOSS' at the microsocial and mesosocial
levels using ethnographic methods (the sort of stuff that anthropologists
classically do to understand groups, their ways, rules and values).  Micro
and meso refer to diadic and moderately populated interpersonal systems that
make up any social action of any size -- the grass roots, so to say, of
social action, social movements and the like.

I have just received an RFP from the NSF which could provide funding for
just this type of research (among other types of social science on social
computing systems).  I have two ideas related to this.  First, I am
interested in making the GCL project into an object of such analysis.  GCL
seems particularly good for this on account that it is not incredibly
dynamic and is a fairly defined group (too active and too big makes it very
hard to use ethnographic methods).   Second, the NSF typically favors
collaborative research proposals.  I have colleagues here at Boise State I
can enroll in the project, but it would add credibility to have a few other
members of GCL as co-PIs on the proposal, so I wonder if anyone currently
involved in GCL would be so interested.

Before even beginning such a proposal, however, it would be necessary to
gain consensus from project members that I could use the GCL project as a
focus on the study.

By way of describing In functional terms what the research would entail, it
would involve (a) my own observations of action as both a member of the
project and as a social scientist, (b) culling through the list archives and
CVS tree for useful details and(c) occasional interviews with members to
check on my own evolving findings and theorizing and to get additional
perspectives on the GCL project and FLOSS in general (the latter to the
extent that members are involved in other FLOSS projects).  The goal of the
research would be to produce social scientific knowledge on how such systems
operate both interactively and structurally, including the tacit and
explicit production of rules, responsibilities, status divisions, values,
etc.  Practices of protecting identities of individuals and the project
would be employed.

At this point, I'm just looking to find out if members of the GCL project
would permit or object to such a focus on the project.  Any say-so at this
point is not final -- it would just give me more information to use in
beginning to draft the proposal for funding.

If the consensus answer is no, I won't pursue the idea further.

Best regards,

_don

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don Winiecki, Ed.D., Ph.D.
Professor
Boise State University, College of Engineering
Department of Instructional & Performance Technology
1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho 83725-2070 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
WWW: http://ipt.boisestate.edu
Telephone: (+01) 208 426 1899
Fax: (+01) 208 426 1970
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Gcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel

Reply via email to