Hi - > [...] To be specific, gcc steering committee and glibc FSF stewards > have announced the decision for their projects [...]
I may be missing something. All I've seen so far were some of the leaders of some of the projects being joint signatories to a letter on overseers@. As far as I'm aware, that is not how any of these projects make or announce **project decisions** with/to their respective constituencies. > I am not aware of any opposition from maintainers of libabigail or > cygwin or any other active sourceware based project over moving > either, but I haven't had any links to those projects, so I may be > uninformed. Indeed. The onus is obviously on the shoulders of the proponents of this proposal to convince each sourceware guest project to consent to move. If you wish to frame any dissent as "blocking full migration", then I'd say the job of convincing everyone just has not been up to par. Perhaps it was the wrong goal all along. - FChE
