On 2022-10-04 10:19, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
I don't see a risk to freedom. The GNU toolchain is quite underfunded
compared to llvm/clang and IMO it's a major risk to maintain status quo on
that front. The GTI opens new avenues for funding aspects of the GNU
toolchain without affecting its core governance.
What aspects of the gnu toolchain are open to being funded via the
LF/GTI proposal, -other than- the vast majority of the funds being
redirected to its own managed services infrastructure?
This current proposal is limited to infrastructure, which has
ever-growing needs. Do you think the current proposal is not an upgrade
to what we currently have?
Sid
