I cloned he repo again but there is a problem here. This line is not in the previous repo. https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libgomp/plugin/Makefrag.am#L29
في الجمعة، ٢٠ مايو، ٢٠٢٢ ٥:٥٨ م Mohamed Atef <mohamedatef1...@gmail.com> كتب: > I am really sorry. > > في الجمعة، ٢٠ مايو، ٢٠٢٢ ٥:٥٨ م Mohamed Atef <mohamedatef1...@gmail.com> > كتب: > >> In fact that's why i downloaded the repo again i forget to modify the >> copyright and when i tried to repush but i got an error As my branch is not >> updated i wanted delete the branch and create new one and push again. >> If you have the authority to remove the last batch please do. >> >> في الجمعة، ٢٠ مايو، ٢٠٢٢ ٥:٥٢ م Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> كتب: >> >>> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:53:36AM +0200, Mohamed Atef wrote: >>> > I use 1.15.1. >>> > This is the link to the line I mentioned. >>> > >>> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libgomp/plugin/Makefrag.am#L29 >>> >>> You shouldn't be running autoreconf, just automake to regenerate >>> Makefile.in, and when I run it, it certainly doesn't emit that error. >>> >>> Anyway, can you explain the >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7a99c5953487c4dd6cdce1b01126ac2b06f16cd >>> commit? That makes the branch quite useless. >>> The point is that all commits pushed to gcc trunk have to have proper >>> ChangeLog in the commit log to describe the actual changes in that >>> commit. >>> Commits aren't allowed to be pushed there unless they satisfy the >>> checking. >>> On development branches this isn't checked on commits, but if those >>> branches are meant to be usable for commits to trunk later, they need to >>> follow those rules (as I said, git gcc-verify should check it). >>> I suppose the 8b5ad311eac66b0939a1e6473a46f68e31158bfe commit might have >>> passed it, but I don't see how c7a99c5953487c4dd6cdce1b01126ac2b06f16cd >>> could, you've used the same ChangeLog entry but that doesn't describe >>> the changes you've done in that commit, you've reverted some Makefile.am >>> changes (why?), removed the FSF Copyright lines (that is ok but it should >>> have been replaced by the Copyright The GNU Toolchain Authors. line in >>> that >>> case), but the ChangeLog then would need to describe those changes. >>> >>> Jakub >>> >>>
