On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 17:16, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > > * Dmitry Vyukov: > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 14:59, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> * Dmitry Vyukov: > >> > >> > Or what kind of integration do you mean? Tsan did not have any direct > >> > integration and worked with unmodified glibc. > >> > >> I thought there is a false-positive data race report if an initial-exec > >> or local-exec TLS variable is reused (whose memory is not managed by > >> malloc). > > > > I don't remember any such open issues. > > This glibc patch submission mentions tsan: > > [PATCH] elf: Add __libc_get_static_tls_bounds [BZ #16291] > <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-September/131388.html> > > It's currently stalled (adding an interface for something that may stop > working in the future is problematic).
I see. Nothing has changed with respect to __libc_get_static_tls_bounds with my patches.
