That will never make it appropriate. I would encourage you to reflect more carefully on the meaning of the words you are reading and using.
These arguments are paper thin, and full of lofty rhetoric; none of them will expand the expectation of anyone here to include integrating their poltical beliefs into the GCC project roadmap beyond its technical and licensing goals. I would encourage anyone reading this to start treating this discussion as off-topic disruption for the GCC SC. -C On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:22 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 4/11/21 9:34 PM, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote: > > > It is not appropriate to discuss the removal of someone based on > > innuendo, provenly false smearing, and other types of political > > maneuvering at the behest of corporations desiring the destruction > > of > > the very projects they are sponsoring. > > Good job that's not what is happening then. > > > It is not appropriate to even suggest to blackmail sponsor or non- > > sponsor organizations by cutting ties with them to force someone > > that a > > couple corporates in your group don't like out of their > > organization. > > I call on those of you who argued this to restore credibility and > > integrity to this discussion. > > People, and companies can chose to support whatever organizations > they desire, > and they can chose to withdraw such support. For what ever reasons > they may have. > > nathan > >
