On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:33:56AM +0000, unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc-help wrote: > I think __builtin_memmove_inline, __builtin_memset_inline can also get > provided. > > That allows better performance for small size copies
You normally will get better performance by letting the compiler figure out whether to inline or not. That is what the Power port does, for example. > and allowing memcpy to be usable without libc. You can provide your own non-standard-named function anyway? In either case, feature requests should go into bugzilla, or they will more than likely be lost. Thanks, Segher
