Any thoughts on what f should return in the following testcase, given the usual GNU behaviour of treating signed >> as arithmetic shift right?
typedef int vs4 __attribute__((vector_size(16))); typedef unsigned int vu4 __attribute__((vector_size(16))); int f (void) { vs4 x = { -1, -1, -1, -1 }; vu4 y = { 0, 0, 0, 0 }; return ((x + y) >> 1)[0]; } The C frontend takes the type of x+y from the first operand, so x+y is signed and f returns -1. The C++ frontend applies similar rules to x+y as it would to scalars, with unsigned T having a higher rank than signed T, so x+y is unsigned and f returns 0x7fffffff. FWIW, Clang treats x+y as signed, so f returns -1 for both C and C++. [Was looking at this in the context of PR96377.] Thanks, Richard