On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 09:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > On 5/9/20 10:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > If you mean for PR reasons or good apeparances, no. But it's wrong to > > have bugs left open that only refer to unsupported versions of GCC. If > > none of the supported releases has the bug (either because it's been > > fixed, or the relevant code has been removed) then the bug should be > > closed. > > > > If the bug is still present in supported versions (like gcc-8 or > > gcc-9) but will never be fixed (like SPE ones) they might as well be > > closed now as WONTFIX. Suggesting anything else will happen to them is > > misleading. > > If you don't accept my opinion, why did you ask for it in the first place.
Eh? This is the first time I've said anything on the subject, I didn't ask for anything, and I didn't say that I don't accept your opinion, and I certainly didn't say the rets of the GCC project doesn't accept your opinion. You asked questions about closing bugs, and I answered them. If you don't accept straightforward answers, why did you ask questions in the first place? > Please do whatever you want. I will still continue to contribute to GCC > and start BountySource campaigns to support, despite my opinion not being > of any relevance. That seems a rather silly overreaction to somebody replying to you, answering your questions.
