On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:11:39PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >Hi! > >Last week after sending status report mails to gcc mailing list, >I've opened the web archive and copied the URLs of those status reports >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232267.html >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232268.html >and checked them into gcc-wwwdocs git >c3162d9e711d3e32935c17d1451c63839d702019 revision. >But today people are complaining that those links don't work anymore >and those mails have >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/000504.html >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/000505.html >URLs instead. >Martin Jambor also said he has posted a URL into the archive >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/231851.html >which is now instead >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html >Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small >numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like >545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >need those, we reference those in commit messages, other mails, bugzilla >etc.
I'll bet this is due to rebuilding the archive after removing spam. Maybe we need to revisit how that's done. cgf
