On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:54:20AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. >> The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy >> to set up a local mailman instance. I've got a patch that changes: > >I suppose we can do some local RPM respins - as long as these changes >are small and rare. Even with a deadish upstream, distro reporting >would be nice, at least at the centos/fedora point (?), as a reference >place to stash the patch and get us a bug#.
I don't think most of the patch would be acceptable upstream since it changes default behavior without any way to revert it.
