GCC never evaluates __atomic_is_lock_free to 0. 
(gcc/builtins.c:fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free)
I'd like to change clang to eagerly evaluate __atomic_is_lock_free to 0 for 
apparently oversized types.
This helps some platforms to avoid a dependency on libatomic.

Either of the following choices can move my patch 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72579 forward:

* GCC will like do the same
* GCC is committed to not extend __atomic_is_lock_free in a clang incompatible 
way.

Reply via email to