Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 11:21, Gaius Mulley <gaiusm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > >> > One thing which you could do is kinda of what glibc did when they >> > merged glibc and glibc-ports. >> > Really it would useful if you get GM2 into the base sources of gcc >> > instead for GCC 11 :). >> >> Hello, >> >> yes indeed this is a huge priority for gm2 - all the big issues are >> resolved now (licensing/gpl3/!libpth). So I'm really hoping this can be >> achieved, > > Great! > > That's even more reason to do it as a branch in (your copies of) the > GCC tree then: it will make the process of submitting patches for > inclusion upstream much more straightforward!
yes this is good to see triangulation of decisions along the same direction of travel - thank you!
