On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 13:06, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > Could you avoid the double negative here? And the error message could > > be more specific to the actual error by testing the two cases > > separately, e.g. > > I'm sort of hoping we don't end up using the hooks in this form for very > long - the patch was posted to demonstrate the features that seem to need > changes to the hook code, but hopefully that code can get extended > upstream to support such features in a cleaner way and then we'll only > need some custom configuration, not custom code.
Gotcha. Forget what I said then.
