On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 22:54, L A Walsh <g...@tlinx.org> wrote:
>
> On 2019/06/09 14:52, Zan Lynx wrote:
> > I am not a GCC developer, just a regular user of C. But I have some
> > comments below:
> >
> > On 6/9/2019 3:21 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
> >
> >> If I have a function returning NULL on error (including EOF).
> >>
> >> So the program calls exit if the function doesn't return
> >> a non-zero value (func() || exit(1)).
> >>
> >> I have:
> >>
> >> --/tmp/ex.c--
> >>
> >> main() { char * buf[512];
> >> while (gets(buf) || exit(0)) puts(buf);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -- compile w/:
> >> gcc -fpermissive --no-warnings -o /tmp/ex /tmp/ex.c
> >>
> >> Got:
> >> /tmp/ex.c: In function ‘main’:
> >> /tmp/ex.c:2:22: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> >> while (gets(buf) || exit(0) ) puts(buf);
> >> ^~~~~~~
> >>
> >> I understand that the while is testing the value of exit
> >> "when it returns", but since it doesn't, why flag an error
> >> (if exit is part of C-standard?) but *especially*, why
> >> not a warning, like a type mismatch or such?
> >>
> >
> > There is a slight misunderstanding of operators here. This is not while
> > testing the value of exit(0). This is the "||" operator. It needs a
> > value on *both* sides of || so it can evaluate them both and return a
> > boolean result. Your code has no value on the right-hand side so it's
> > meaningless.
> >
> ----
> Um, but '||' and '&&' provide short circuiting. So in the case where
That's irrelevant (but then this whole question is irrelevant to this
mailing list and really belongs somewhere dedicated to C programming).
> the first function is true, the 2nd won't be called. If the 2nd is called
> it is guaranteed by the C11(17) standard not to return, so there can never
> be a need for a return value in C11, as the program will terminate before
> the value could be needed.
But C is still a statically typed language. The || operator requires
two operands with scalar type, so void is not allowed.
The fact that exit doesn't return is not part of the type system. The
return type of exit is void, and so you can't use it where void is not
allowed.
> Still works though. In gcc 8.2.1 (which is said to be C18
> compliant).
gets is provide by your C library, not GCC.
