On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:34, Rainer Emrich <rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de> wrote:
>
> Am 16.04.2019 um 14:10 schrieb Christophe Lyon:
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 13:04, Rainer Emrich <rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 16.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> >>> Am 15.04.2019 um 20:12 schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> >>>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> >>>>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:38 schrieb Jakub Jelinek:
> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> >>>>>>> There seems to be a generic issue with the tests in gcc/testsuite. The
> >>>>>>> log files do not contain the logs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Perhaps contrib/dg-extract-results* misbehaved?
> >>>>>> Can you look for the testsuite/g++*/g++.log.sep files?  Do they contain
> >>>>>> everything?
> >>>> The *.log.sep files seem to be ok.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> If yes, can you try to say
> >>>>>> mv contrib/dg-extract-results.py{,.bad}
> >>>>>> and retry, to see if there isn't a problem with the python version 
> >>>>>> thereof?
> >>>> I will try this over the night.
> >>> The shell version of dg-extract-results does not work either.
> >>>
> >>> AFAIS, there were changes to the dg-extract-results script 5th of March.
> >>> Looks like these changes are causing the issue, but I'm not sure.
> >>>
> >>> What I can say, my setup works at least for the gcc-8 branch and used to
> >>> work in the past.
> >> I tested dg-extractresults.sh manually and found that the change from
> >> 4th of February, revision 268411 broke the log extraction. Easy to test
> >> with version from 23rd of September last year which works.
> >>
> >> I don't have the time to analyze the python version, but my bet, it's
> >> the same issue.
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the breakage, I really wanted to improve those scripts.
> > Could you give me a reproducer, since we didn't notice problems in our
> > validations?
> Hi Christope,
>
> I executed the dg-extract-results.sh manually in the gcc/testsuite
> directory after a complete testsuite run which didn't give the correct
> results. Rev. 240429 gives the expected results, where rev 268511 fails.
> I'm on windows using msys2 with bash 4.4.23.
>
> I'm bootsrapping at the moment but that's really slow on windows. When
> the testsuite run is finished I try to assemble a reproducer. This will
> take a while.
>

OK, thanks! Do you mean the problem happens on Windows only?

> Thanks,
>
> Rainer
>

Reply via email to