On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:34, Rainer Emrich <rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de> wrote: > > Am 16.04.2019 um 14:10 schrieb Christophe Lyon: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 13:04, Rainer Emrich <rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de> > > wrote: > >> > >> Am 16.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > >>> Am 15.04.2019 um 20:12 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > >>>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > >>>>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:38 schrieb Jakub Jelinek: > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Rainer Emrich wrote: > >>>>>>> There seems to be a generic issue with the tests in gcc/testsuite. The > >>>>>>> log files do not contain the logs. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Perhaps contrib/dg-extract-results* misbehaved? > >>>>>> Can you look for the testsuite/g++*/g++.log.sep files? Do they contain > >>>>>> everything? > >>>> The *.log.sep files seem to be ok. > >>>> > >>>>>> If yes, can you try to say > >>>>>> mv contrib/dg-extract-results.py{,.bad} > >>>>>> and retry, to see if there isn't a problem with the python version > >>>>>> thereof? > >>>> I will try this over the night. > >>> The shell version of dg-extract-results does not work either. > >>> > >>> AFAIS, there were changes to the dg-extract-results script 5th of March. > >>> Looks like these changes are causing the issue, but I'm not sure. > >>> > >>> What I can say, my setup works at least for the gcc-8 branch and used to > >>> work in the past. > >> I tested dg-extractresults.sh manually and found that the change from > >> 4th of February, revision 268411 broke the log extraction. Easy to test > >> with version from 23rd of September last year which works. > >> > >> I don't have the time to analyze the python version, but my bet, it's > >> the same issue. > >> > > Hi, > > > > Sorry for the breakage, I really wanted to improve those scripts. > > Could you give me a reproducer, since we didn't notice problems in our > > validations? > Hi Christope, > > I executed the dg-extract-results.sh manually in the gcc/testsuite > directory after a complete testsuite run which didn't give the correct > results. Rev. 240429 gives the expected results, where rev 268511 fails. > I'm on windows using msys2 with bash 4.4.23. > > I'm bootsrapping at the moment but that's really slow on windows. When > the testsuite run is finished I try to assemble a reproducer. This will > take a while. >
OK, thanks! Do you mean the problem happens on Windows only? > Thanks, > > Rainer >