Hello!
I just chose the word "unmatched" for now.. let me know if "stray" or
some other word is better. :-)
I have a work in progress patch that as far as I can tell works.
I wonder if you see some problems with my design. What do I need to
do..? Basically I have chosen to add a nesting_depth to the c_parser
struct. That is updated in the consume_token. I first tried to add
such variable in c_parser_declaration_or_fndef() but that was much
more difficult.
I wanted to warn about unmatched }. It is however more complicated
than I thought. For two reasons:
The first reason is the hard problem, but maybe we can ignore this now also:
void f()
{
} // <- looking at the indentation, it seems preferable to warn about this
}
The second reason is easier.. I just don't want to get into too deep
water too quickly. To warn about that also I can't just have a
nesting_depth anymore. I need to have a stack that track the nesting.
I have experimented with a linked list like this and made it work:
struct nesting {
cpp_ttype type;
struct nesting *next;
};
but well here I run into memory management and I also wonder if you
like the design decision to put a linked list in the c_parser struct.
Here is my current patch...
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
index 972b629c092..eabc5ffa15e 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ struct GTY(()) c_parser {
/* How many look-ahead tokens are available (0 - 4, or
more if parsing from pre-lexed tokens). */
unsigned int tokens_avail;
+ /* nesting depth in expression (parentheses / squares) */
+ unsigned int nesting_depth;
/* True if a syntax error is being recovered from; false otherwise.
c_parser_error sets this flag. It should clear this flag when
enough tokens have been consumed to recover from the error. */
@@ -763,6 +765,22 @@ c_parser_next_tokens_start_declaration (c_parser *parser)
return false;
}
+/* Nesting start token */
+
+static bool c_parser_is_nesting_start (c_parser *parser)
+{
+ return c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_PAREN) ||
+ c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_SQUARE);
+}
+
+/* Nesting end token */
+
+static bool c_parser_is_nesting_end (c_parser *parser)
+{
+ return c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN) ||
+ c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_CLOSE_SQUARE);
+}
+
/* Consume the next token from PARSER. */
void
@@ -772,6 +790,10 @@ c_parser_consume_token (c_parser *parser)
gcc_assert (parser->tokens[0].type != CPP_EOF);
gcc_assert (!parser->in_pragma || parser->tokens[0].type != CPP_PRAGMA_EOL);
gcc_assert (parser->error || parser->tokens[0].type != CPP_PRAGMA);
+ if (c_parser_is_nesting_start (parser))
+ parser->nesting_depth++;
+ else if (parser->nesting_depth > 0 && c_parser_is_nesting_end (parser))
+ parser->nesting_depth--;
parser->last_token_location = parser->tokens[0].location;
if (parser->tokens != &parser->tokens_buf[0])
parser->tokens++;
@@ -1673,6 +1695,20 @@ add_debug_begin_stmt (location_t loc)
add_stmt (stmt);
}
+static bool c_parser_unmatched_p (c_parser *parser)
+{
+ if (c_parser_is_nesting_end (parser))
+ return parser->nesting_depth == 0;
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void complain_about_unmatched_token (c_parser *parser)
+{
+ c_token *token = c_parser_peek_token(parser);
+ error_at (token->location, "unmatched %<%s%>",
+ cpp_type2name(token->type, token->flags));
+}
+
/* Parse a declaration or function definition (C90 6.5, 6.7.1, C99
6.7, 6.9.1, C11 6.7, 6.9.1). If FNDEF_OK is true, a function definition
is accepted; otherwise (old-style parameter declarations) only other
@@ -2228,7 +2264,10 @@ c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (c_parser
*parser, bool fndef_ok,
}
else
{
- c_parser_error (parser, "expected %<,%> or %<;%>");
+ if (c_parser_unmatched_p (parser))
+ complain_about_unmatched_token (parser);
+ else
+ c_parser_error (parser, "expected %<,%> or %<;%>");
c_parser_skip_to_end_of_block_or_statement (parser);
return;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unmatched.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unmatched.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bd458a01109
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unmatched.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+void f1() {
+ int a = 0)+3; /* { dg-error "unmatched" } */
+}
+
+void f2() {
+ int b = (1]+3; /* { dg-error "expected" } */
+}
+
+void f3() {
+ int b = 1]+3; /* { dg-error "unmatched" } */
+}
+
+void f4() {
+ int c = (1))+3; /* { dg-error "unmatched" } */
+}
+
Best regards,
Daniel Marjamäki