On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 12:19 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > I've been noticing a number of failures in LTO (and some other) > tests in my x86_64-builds most of which don't appear in results > reported on gcc-testresults (all those on lines that start with > with the '!' below) and that I don't recall seeing before. > > The LTO tests seem to fail with errors like the one below: > > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccIaufZk.lto.o: plugin needed to handle lto object > FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr64043 cp_lto_pr64043_0.o-cp_lto_pr64043_0.o link, > -flto -std=c++11 > > Has something changed in how GCC should be configured or built > or what version of Binutils it needs for these tests to pass? > My builds run on Fedora 25 with Binutils 2.26.1-1.fc25. > > Thanks > Martin > > FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/pr55976-1.c (7: -14) > ! FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-1.c (1: +1) > FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C (1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20091002-1 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr64043 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65193 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65302 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65316 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65549 (2: +2) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr66180 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr66705 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr68057 (4: +4) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr69077 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr69133 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr69137 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr79000 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr81940 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr85176 (1: +1) > FAIL: g++.dg/pr80481.C (3: -6) > ! FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr79108 (1: +1) > ! FAIL: ./index0-out.go (1: +1) > ! FAIL: jit.dg/test-compile-to-assembler.c, (1: +1) > ! FAIL: jit.dg/test-compile-to-object.c, (1: +1)
I don't know about the LTO issues, but what are the jit.dg failures that you're seeing?
