On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Cory Fields <li...@coryfields.com> wrote: > Hi list > > I'm playing with -static-pie and musl, which seems to be in good shape > for 8.0.0. Nice work :) > > However, the fact that "gcc -static -pie" and "gcc -static-pie" > produce different results is very unexpected. I understand the case > for the new link-type, but merging the options when possible would be > a huge benefit to existing buildsystems that already cope with both > individually. > > My use-case: > I'd like to build with --enable-default-pie, and by adding "-static"
Why not adding "-static-pie" instead of "-static"? > to my builds, produce static-pie binaries. But at the moment, that > attempts to add an interp section. > > So my question is, if no conflicting options are found, why not hoist > "-static -pie" to "-static-pie" ? > > Regards, > Cory -- H.J.
