On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > There's a fair amount of surgery to be done still. You have 151 > mid-branch deletealls. This usually indicates that a Subversion tag or > branch was created by mistake, and someone later tried to undo the
Some may be mistakes - I think some are deliberate rebases. There's a policy question we'll need to figure out for after the conversion of whether we want to have a branch namespace where people can push branches that can be deleted and rebased (while branches outside that namespace can't be deleted / rebased). (Where a git rebase of course is different from an SVN rebase in that the history becomes liable to be garbage-collected.) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
