Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes:
> On August 21, 2017 5:43:08 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez
> <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>The attached patch fixes the problem by sign extending before
>>constructing the wide int. It does so while constructing the
>>hwi_with_prec object, since the int_traits <wi::hwi_with_prec>
>>container has is_sign_extended=true, so I assume the underlying
>>hwi_with_prec must be stored with sign extension.
>>
>>Is this what you had in mind, or would you prefer the sign extension
>>in the wi::int_traits <wi::hwi_with_prec> decompose routine?
>>
>>Or somewhere else entirely ;-).
>
> Richard?
Think it should be "<" rather than "<=". LGTM with that change, thanks.
Richard
>>Thanks.
>>Aldy
>>
>>On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Richard Biener
>><richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On August 20, 2017 10:46:54 AM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez
>><al...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>Hi folks.
>>>>
>>>>Calling wi::max_value() of a boolean_type creates a wide_int with all
>>>>bits set, not just the least significant bit.
>>>>
>>>>tree type = boolean_type_node;
>>>>wide_int x = wi::max_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), TYPE_SIGN (type));
>>>>(gdb) print x.dump()
>>>>[0xffffffffffffffff], precision = 1
>>>>
>>>>However, one can also create a boolean of true with:
>>>>
>>>>wide_int one = wi::uhwi (1, TYPE_PRECISION (boolean_type_node));
>>>>(gdb) print one.dump()
>>>>[0x1], precision = 1
>>>
>>> Looks like this one fails to be sign extended.
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>>>These will not be equal to each other because wi::eq_p() will only
>>>>strip
>>>>off excess bits when <is_sign_extended=false>. However,
>>>>is_sign_extended=true for all wide_int's.
>>>>
>>>>Am I doing something wrong?
>>>>
>>>>Could I change wi::max_value() to strip off excess bits, instead of
>>>>setting all bits like it's currently doing:
>>>>
>>>>wide_int
>>>>wi::max_value (unsigned int precision, signop sgn)
>>>>{
>>>> gcc_checking_assert (precision != 0);
>>>> if (sgn == UNSIGNED)
>>>> /* The unsigned max is just all ones. */
>>>> return shwi (-1, precision);
>>>>...
>>>>...
>>>>
>>>>Or perhaps change wi::eq_p() to strip off excess bits?
>>>>
>>>>Or am I missing something else entirely?
>>>>Aldy
>>>
