On 07/21/2017 12:40 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 07/21/2017 07:50 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > >> (set (match_operand:SI "register_operand" "=a,b") >> (match_operand:SI "memory_operand" "Ra,Rb")) > > > How horrible would it be to split expose the entire mem: > > (set (match_operand:SI "register" "=a,b") > (mem:SI (match_operand:SI "register" "a,b"))) > + variants for reg+const if you have them? Doesn't that run afoul of the various restrictions on the movXX patterns?
jeff
