On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:48:05AM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > We also still have to agree on the target triples for the new port. > > If you have any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear them. > > It seems fairly obvious that the powerpc-*-eabispe* and > powerpc*-*-linux*spe* triples should continue to work while being mapped > to the new CPU port. It's less obvious what triples should be used for > SPE versions of other SPE-supporting configurations such as > powerpc-*-eabisim*, powerpc-*-rtems*, powerpc-wrs-vxworks*.
My current patches have powerpc*-*-*spe* for the powerpcspe port. Maybe it should also allow powerpcspe-*-*? If people are willing to change the target triple they use. > Some testcases will be applicable to both ports, some to only one. Yeah; but we can sort that out later, no change is needed as long as the new port is essentially a copy of rs6000 :-) > Maintainers of each port should of course watch the other port for changes > that should be carried across, even if we believe, as has been stated in > this discussion, that the parts of the code that would be present in both > ports are stable and very rarely change. Right. Segher
