On 19 February 2016 at 14:35, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote:
> struct S {
> S() {something();}
> };
>
> would be an empty type, and that's not what we want.Why not? The default constructor is never invoked as part of passing such an object around. Its copy constructor is a nop and requires no reference to the original object. Matthijs van Duin
