> I was saying that early inlining is not supposed to catch this case > but IPA inlining. > it shouldn't need to inline g early to end up inlining the calls to sq. IPA > CP > should clone g for the case of it calling sq and then inlining should > just do its job.
Ok, I fully agree with that, forcing early inlining to trigger late inlining is just a workaround. But there is still the fact that ipa inlining is indeed inlining the compound literal case (despite ipa cp failing there) while it's unable to inline the static const case that, as I understand it, you don't seem to consider a missed oportunity for ipa cp. So say you fix the "aggregate D.1772" scenario, I guess it won't change anything regarding ipa inlining. Cheers -- Carlos
