On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > As a trivial example of the possibilities, sometimes when I do conversions > I fix obvious comment typos. I generally have to edit the comment history > anyway > to tweak comments that don't have git-style summary lines into shape, so > fixing typos is not much additional work.
With 227369 revisions I don't think adding git-style summary lines is really practical without some very reliable automation to match commits to corresponding gcc-patches messages (whose Subject: headers would be the natural choice for such summary lines).... -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
