On April 11, 2015 9:23:18 PM GMT+02:00, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Richard Biener wrote: >> The following aims to document the details of the versioning scheme >we >> intend to use for GCC 5 and up. >> >> Summary in non-html: Development of GCC 5 will happen as >> GCC 5.0.0 (experimental), once we enter regression-fixing-only mode >> (post-stage3) it will become GCC 5.0.1 (prerelease). The >> GCC 5 release itself will be numbered GCC 5.1.0 and development >> on the branch will continue as GCC 5.1.1 followed by a GCC 5.2.0 >> release and GCC 5.2.1 branch development. Stage1 of GCC 6 will >> bump us to GCC 6.0.0. > >Is the idea really to call the actual releases 5.1.0, 5.2.0 and >so forth, or will those be labled 5.1, 5.2,...? > >Using the former for gcc/BASEVER etc. make sense. From a "marketing" >perspective I would recommend the simpler 5.1, 5.2, etc.
5.1 Richard. >Gerald
