> On 02/16/2015 07:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >Jason, I wonder if there is more informative way to print destructor during > >LTO than as __comp_dtor? > > You could print the mangled name, and possibly run it through > __cxa_demangle if it starts with _Z. > > >Laos for named types, > >perhaps printing just type name instead of the wrong "struct typename" > >(because we make no difference between struct and > >class at LTO) would be cleaner. > > That makes sense.
Since we have mangled names for types, too, I think it is matter of convincing the LTO langhooks doing the right thing and using demanlger... I will try to look into this. Honza > > Jason >
