On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Steve Ellcey <sell...@mips.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 11:27 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> > Is there a reason why GCC couldn't (under -ffast-math) call the single
>> > precision routines for the first case?
>>
>> There is no reason why it could not.  The reason why it does not
>> currently is because there is no pass which does the demotion and the
>> only case of demotion that happens is with a simple
>> (float)function((double)float_val);
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
>
> Do you know which pass does the simple
> '(float)function((double)float_val)' demotion?  Maybe that would be a
> good place to extend things.

Yes builtins.c.

>
> Steve Ellcey
>

Reply via email to