On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Toon Moene <t...@moene.org> wrote: > On 10/01/2014 08:00 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: >> >> -gcc folks. >> >> Why not use clang then? >> It offers many more nice features. > > > What's the Fortran front-end called for clang (or do you really think we are > going to write Weather Forecasting codes in C :-) )
Oh, crap. :) --kcc > > Kind regards, > > >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Toon Moene <t...@moene.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/01/2014 06:21 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote: >>> >>>>> it was certainly worth it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> since I see msan as a kind of valgrind replacement (similar >>>> functionality, >>>> but ~10x the speed, partially at the cost of more difficult deployment), >>>> I >>>> did a quick search in gcc bugzilla. 982 PRs mention valgrind, so such >>>> functionality is clearly heavily used. >>> >>> >>> >>> That would be interesting - valgrind is certainly impossible to use on >>> our >>> Weather Forecasting code (far too large, as valgrind helpfully points >>> out). >>> >>> -- >>> Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 >>> Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands >>> At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ >>> Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news >> >> > > > -- > Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 > Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands > At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ > Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
