On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:14 AM, DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> wrote: > > The rx back-end doesn't define TARGET_FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED, as the > documentation says the compiler handles target-independent reasons why > there needs to be a frame pointer. But, the default > TARGET_FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED just returns false - shouldn't it, by > default, check for calls_alloca ?
calls_alloce is checked where frame_pointer_needed is set, in ira_setup_eliminable_regset in ira.c. TARGET_FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED only needs to handle target-specific conditions. Ian
