David Guillen <da...@davidgf.net> writes: > In any case I'm not using the restrict variable and I'm assuming > strict is zero, this is, not checking the hard regsiters themselves. > This is because any reg is OK for base reg. I'm pretty sure I'm > behaving similarly to arm, cris or x86 backends.
"strict" doesn't mean which hard register it is, "strict" means whether or not it's a hard register at all. If "strict" is true, you must assume any REG which isn't a real hard register (i.e. REGNO >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) does NOT match.
