On 09/20/13 17:20, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/12/2013 03:22 AM, Víctor Martínez wrote:
Why is sjlj.o the only one built for armv4 while the rest of objects are armv5t?
Is this behaviour expected? Or is there something wrong trying to configure gcc
with these options?
There are co-processor instructions in there that can't be encoded with thumb1,
as present on armv5t. It is as expected.
r~
Thank you very much for the clarification.
--
Learning bit by bit
Victor Martinez | http://lokalix.dyndns.org
