Hi Jonathan, Thank you for your reply. And about the error i encounter, do you have any advice? maybe it is caused by my toolchain not install rightly? In the standard pc686 architecture(not cross compile on RTEMS) will it encounter the similar error?
WeiY Best Regards 在 2013-8-6，下午11:25，Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> 写道： > On 6 August 2013 15:47, Deng Hengyi wrote: >> >> And i have found some mail list talking about gcc has remove lock free >> atomic int support [1][2], is this true? or just some error caused by my >> toolchain? >> >> I am waiting for your reply, Thank you! >> >> >> [1]. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-12/msg00079.html >> [2]. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTI1MDU > > > No it's not true, you've misunderstood. > > There was a proposal to deprecate (not remove) i386 support, but it > didn't happen. > > Even if it did happen, that wouldn't remove support for lock-free > atomic ints, only i386 targets would be affected (not i486 or later), > and they don't fully support lock-free atomic ints anyway.
