On 07/29/2013 07:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
2013/7/29 Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de>:
Looks like r153734 got it wrong first. It was supposed to revert
r149964, but failed. Then r153742 reverted the revertion, and when
r153768 reintroduced it it was apparently modeled after r153734 instead
of the state before r149964.
And the NULL-handling changes in r149964 shouldn't have been reverted
anyway.
Anyway, if we assume that r153734 got it wrong and hence it is now
wrong in the mainline, we can pull up the r149964 state with:
/* If not, it should be either in the global namespace, or directly
in a local function scope. */
gcc_assert (context == global_namespace
- || context != NULL
+ || context == NULL
|| TREE_CODE (context) == FUNCTION_DECL);
but then we will get ICE with g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-defarg3.C,
which would be a problem itself.
Yep, I'll deal.
Jason
