On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Veres Lajos wrote: > Around 99% of the typos are in comments and documentations a few of them > are only in function/variable names (living code). > I think it is not really history obtrusive. > > I will create a small subset for preview and send it for reviewing. > (I would not do the whole before getting a green signal... It could take > me at least 4-5 hours to review the whole patch...)
http://lavela.hu/gcc.misspell-fixer.20130704.notrevised.patch.bz2 This is the patch generated by the misspell fixer script. (This is the patch against the whole tree.) I did NOT reviewed it yet. What do you think could it be usefull? Should I review the file? Probably I could remove some false positives, but I am not a C expert. -- Veres Lajos vla...@gmail.com +36 20 438 5909
