> For example, I used to think that it would be a good idea to
> document the tree form(s), but I now realize that the file tree.h is
> exactly what is required.

Indeed.  And we do try hard to make sure that the comments are updated
when the contents are.  That's why I'm not sure a big fan of these
automated "documentation" generators.  What's important is the
*content*.  And if the content is in the .h file, it can be read from
there.  If it isn't, or isn't up to date, then all these programs do
is illustrate GIGO.

Reply via email to