Thanks for the quick reply.
As per the C++ standard (ISO/IEC 14882, 1998 first edition)
Section 9: Classes definition says.
Complete objects and member subobjects of class type shall have nonzero size.
Corrent me if i'm wrong here, but from this i had concluded empty object and
structures are not part of C++ standard (or maybe my copy of standard is old).
And they're implemented as part of GCC/G++ extension.
If so, then my question stands that how do we decide that a structure is empty ?
As per the definition of empty structures extension, should have size 1 byte in
g++.
So what do we call structures which return size 0 in g++ ?
Eg:
struct T4
{long int:0;}t4;
//has size 1 in g++
whereas
struct T1
{struct{}a[0]; }t1;
//has size 0 in g++
As based on the size of object, optimization can take place at the caller and
callee side (eg: ignoring of records with 0 size in the argument list of
variable arguments to reduce stack operation).
And since G++/GCC has ABI compatibility with several other compilers, i was
hoping if there would be some rule to distinguish as to when to assign 1 byte
and when 0 for empty structures.
Warm Regards,
Naveen
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Jonathan Wakely<jwakely....@gmail.com>
Date : Jan 03, 2013 00:17 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: Query for Empty Structure Extension.
On 2 January 2013 14:32, NAVEEN CHANDRAKAR wrote:
>
> My question is what is the definition/grammer of empty structure. As i
> couldn't find it covered in C/Cxx standard document.
The page you linked to defines a GCC extension to the C language, so
if course it's not in the C standard. As the page says, ISO C++ allows
empty structures, it's just a class with no members, which is valid in
ISO C++ anyway.
