On 22/12/12 10:13, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Dec 20, 2012, "Paulo Matos" <pma...@broadcom.com> wrote:

This doesn't look sensible to me (but I might be overlooking a reason why we 
want to do so) in the context of cselib_record_sets, however, I think 
cselib_record_sets should instead have the patch applied:
- for_each_inc_dec (&insn, cselib_record_autoinc_cb, &data);
+ for_each_inc_dec (&body, cselib_record_autoinc_cb, &data);

Yeah, that makes sense.  Walking over REG_NOTES was surely unexpected to
me.


Thanks for your comment, I will prepare a patch after this holiday period.

Cheers,

Paulo Matos

Reply via email to