On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> >> Diego and I seek your comments on the following (loose) proposal. >> >> >> We propose to provide several function overload sets, as below. >> >> >> dump_pretty >> >> This function overload set provides the bulk of the printing. >> They will use the existing pretty-printer functions in their >> implementation. > > Since this is the one that would be most commonly used, could we just call > it "dump"?
I think it makes sense, yeah. > assuming there aren't any varargs, why not simply move the 'FILE *' > parameter to the end, default it to STDERR, and then only have the one > function... I'm certainly not locked into the old style must-have-FILE > first paradigm. Yes, good point. Diego.
