> Right, there's no explicit dependencies for seh_init.o at all, although > this is not something new. Has something changed recently in the way > e.g. system.h or similar are generated/handled that would explain this > change in behavior?
No changes as far as I know, but maybe Diego got a brand new box. :-) > I guess we should in any case go ahead and add explicit deps for seh_init.o? > Eric, would you mind have a shot at it? OK, I'm going to audit the dependencies (env.o is missing, initialize.o is incomplete, etc) and install something shortly. -- Eric Botcazou
