On Aug 1, 2012, at 13:18 , Alan Modra wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01668.html.
> I like the idea.
:-)
> It is worth pursuing for code improvement we'll see
> even if we avoid the "o" constraint everywhere. For example,
> long long llo (long long *x) { return x[4095]; }
> will generate better powerpc -m32 -O2 code with your patch applied, I
> think.
OK. I guess I'll need to re-adapt it on top of your changes
and re-test.
My build/test machine for this configuration is down ATM, with
hardware maintenance required so this might have to wait a bit.
Thanks for your feedback,
Olivier
