"Peter A. Felvegi" <pets...@praire-chicken.com> writes: > All versions I've tried (4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7) compiles the code. clang > gives proper diagnostic stating that Base::foo is private. > > If base::foo is not static, gcc catches the error, too: > gccacbug.cpp: In member function ‘int DerivT<T>::Foo() [with T = void]’: > gccacbug.cpp:25: instantiated from here > gccacbug.cpp:4: error: ‘int Base::foo’ is private > gccacbug.cpp:19: error: within this context > > If I enable the non-templated Deriv class, I get an error (twice): > gccacbug.cpp: In member function ‘int Deriv::Foo()’: > gccacbug.cpp:3:13: error: ‘int Base::foo’ is private > gccacbug.cpp:10:21: error: within this context > gccacbug.cpp:3:13: error: ‘int Base::foo’ is private > gccacbug.cpp:10:21: error: within this context > > Searching bugzilla for 'static member access' didn't give any > results. Should I file a bug report?
Looks like an instance of http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16617 , http://gcc.gnu.org/PR47346 , http://gcc.gnu.org/PR48078 , and friends. Ian
